User Tools

Site Tools


group_5

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
group_5 [2018/09/13 16:13]
flowerdew
group_5 [2018/09/13 16:18]
flowerdew
Line 26: Line 26:
   * Using 'WRITE 6 VMAX(RAY(1))' x<sub>max</sub> was calculated to be 0.2909704181068736E-002 m   * Using 'WRITE 6 VMAX(RAY(1))' x<sub>max</sub> was calculated to be 0.2909704181068736E-002 m
   * Plotting COSY beam size (x) and the quadrupole field strength(divided by aperture radius) and arrived at the graph below. Data doesn't appear to fit the quadratic form too closely.   * Plotting COSY beam size (x) and the quadrupole field strength(divided by aperture radius) and arrived at the graph below. Data doesn't appear to fit the quadratic form too closely.
-  * Calculated emittance is around 50% larger than the 'real' emittance.+  * Calculated emittance is about 0.3 mm mrad, which is 50% larger than the 'real' emittance.
  
-{{::emittanceexample7.png?400|}}+{{emittanceexample7.png}}
  
 Question 7: Question 7:
Line 42: Line 42:
 {{Group5_screen_shot_2018-09-13_at_15.48.23.png }} {{Group5_screen_shot_2018-09-13_at_15.48.23.png }}
  
-  * This optimisation improved the mass resolution from 640.86349 to 724.5905, while still focusing. +  * This optimisation improved the mass resolution from 640.86349 to 724.66207, while still focusing. {{:group5_screen_shot_2018-09-13_at_15.48.23.png?400|}}
  
/srv/thewikis/JIOSS/data/pages/group_5.txt ยท Last modified: 2018/09/14 09:13 by surbrook