User Tools

Site Tools


group_secar2.0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/11 14:41]
plastun
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/11 16:14]
wagner
Line 1: Line 1:
 Group SECAR2.0 Group SECAR2.0
  
-Reaction: <sup>45</sup>V(p,γ)<sup>46</sup>Cr\\+-by Alex, Nadeesha and Louis- 
 + 
 +====== DAY1======\\ 
 + 
 +===== Getting started =====\\ 
 +Choosen example reaction: <sup>45</sup>V(p,γ)<sup>46</sup>Cr\\ 
 +⇒important for <sup>44</sup>Ti production rate in core collapse Supernova ([[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947403008704|Horoi et al. Nucl.Phys.A 718, (2003)]])\\
 Beam: <sup>45</sup>V<sup>13+</sup> of 135 MeV (1% enegry spread)\\ Beam: <sup>45</sup>V<sup>13+</sup> of 135 MeV (1% enegry spread)\\
 {{ :dipole.png?300 |}}\\ {{ :dipole.png?300 |}}\\
-Matrix:\\+**Understanding COSY Matrix output:**\\
 |1.0|0.0|0.0|0.0|-0.41| |1.0|0.0|0.0|0.0|-0.41|
 |2.2|1.0|0.0|0.0|-0.35|\\ |2.2|1.0|0.0|0.0|-0.35|\\
Line 28: Line 34:
 {{ :dipole46cr13.png?400 |}} {{ :dipole46cr13.png?400 |}}
  
-Q7 strenght variation:\\ +**DAY2**\\
-|Q7 [T]|profile [mm]| +
-|0.3401|29.0|\\ +
-|-0.3401|5.6|\\ +
 **Emittance measurement**\\ **Emittance measurement**\\
 Distance between Q7 center and focal plane is 6.085 m. Distance between Q7 center and focal plane is 6.085 m.
 {{ :emittance.png?400 |}} {{ :emittance.png?400 |}}
  
-B Xmax ap Brho L K +**Q7 strenght variation:**\\ 
-0.02 2.91E-03 0.13 0.8 0.34 0.065384615 +|[T] |Xmax[m] |ap [m] |Brho* [Tm] |[m] |K| 
-0.01 2.27E-03 0.13 0.8 0.34 0.032692308 +|0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.065384615| 
-0 1.62E-03 0.13 0.8 0.34 0 +|0.01 |2.27E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.032692308| 
--0.01 1.20E-03 0.13 0.8 0.34 -0.032692308 +|0 |1.62E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0| 
--0.02 9.08E-04 0.13 0.8 0.34 -0.065384615 +|-0.01 |1.20E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.032692308| 
--0.03 6.23E-04 0.13 0.8 0.34 -0.098076923 +|-0.02 |9.08E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.065384615| 
--0.04 9.54E-04 0.13 0.8 0.34 -0.130769231 +|-0.03 |6.23E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.098076923| 
--0.05 1.60E-03 0.13 0.8 0.34 -0.163461538 +|-0.04 |9.54E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.130769231| 
--0.06 2.26E-03 0.13 0.8 0.34 -0.196153846+|-0.05 |1.60E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.163461538| 
 +|-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.196153846|\\ 
 + 
 +*Brho the magnetic rigidity was extracted from COSY by comand CONS(CHIM)\\ 
 + 
 +**Fit of the data to parabola** 
 +{{ :plot.png?400 |}} 
 + 
 +a = 0.000362572706 \\ 
 +b = 0.0834414129893 \\ 
 +c = 3.506973286e-07\\ 
 +Double check for beam size calculation in Q7: X_calculated = 3.13mm, X_cosy_read_out = 3.16mm at the Q7 exit.\\ 
 +Emittance = 3.045387898578198e-07  π m rad= 0.3 π mm mrad.\\ 
 +Start beam emittance= XX * AX= 0.2 π mm mrad, so the emittance grows from the start to the focal point.\\ 
 +This rmittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. Input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. optics is non-linear.\\ 
  
/srv/thewikis/JIOSS/data/pages/group_secar2.0.txt · Last modified: 2018/09/13 16:49 by plastun