This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/11 15:16] plastun |
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/11 16:01] wagner |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Group SECAR2.0 | Group SECAR2.0 | ||
+ | **DAY1 | ||
+ | **\\ | ||
Reaction: < | Reaction: < | ||
Beam: < | Beam: < | ||
Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
+ | **DAY2**\\ | ||
**Emittance measurement**\\ | **Emittance measurement**\\ | ||
Distance between Q7 center and focal plane is 6.085 m. | Distance between Q7 center and focal plane is 6.085 m. | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | Q7 strenght variation: | + | **Q7 strenght variation:**\\ |
- | |B [T] |Xmax[m] |ap [m] |Brho [Tm] |L [m] |K| | + | |B [T] |Xmax[m] |ap [m] |Brho* [Tm] |L [m] |K| |
|0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.065384615| | |0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.065384615| | ||
|0.01 |2.27E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.032692308| | |0.01 |2.27E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.032692308| | ||
Line 45: | Line 47: | ||
|-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.196153846|\\ | |-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.196153846|\\ | ||
- | Fit of the data to parabola | + | *Brho the magnetic rigidity was extracted from COSY by comand CONS(CHIM)\\ |
+ | |||
+ | **Fit of the data to parabola** | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | a = 0.000362572706 \\ | ||
+ | b = 0.0834414129893 \\ | ||
+ | c = 3.506973286e-07\\ | ||
+ | Double check for beam size calculation in Q7: X_calculated = 3.13mm, X_cosy_read_out = 3.16mm at the Q7 exit.\\ | ||
+ | Emittance = 3.045387898578198e-07 | ||
+ | Start beam emittance= XX * AX= 0.2 π mm mrad, so the emittance grows from the start to the focal point.\\ | ||
+ | This rmittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. Input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. optics is non-linear.\\ | ||
+ | |||