This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/11 15:37] wagner |
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/11 15:53] wagner |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Group SECAR2.0 | Group SECAR2.0 | ||
+ | **DAY1 | ||
+ | **\\ | ||
Reaction: < | Reaction: < | ||
Beam: < | Beam: < | ||
Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
+ | **DAY2**\\ | ||
**Emittance measurement**\\ | **Emittance measurement**\\ | ||
Distance between Q7 center and focal plane is 6.085 m. | Distance between Q7 center and focal plane is 6.085 m. | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | Q7 strenght variation: | + | **Q7 strenght variation:**\\ |
|B [T] |Xmax[m] |ap [m] |Brho [Tm] |L [m] |K| | |B [T] |Xmax[m] |ap [m] |Brho [Tm] |L [m] |K| | ||
|0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.065384615| | |0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.065384615| | ||
Line 45: | Line 47: | ||
|-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.196153846|\\ | |-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.196153846|\\ | ||
+ | Brho the magnetic rigidity was extracted from COSY by comand CONS(CHIM) | ||
**Fit of the data to parabola** | **Fit of the data to parabola** | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
Line 51: | Line 54: | ||
b = 0.0834414129893 \\ | b = 0.0834414129893 \\ | ||
c = 3.506973286e-07\\ | c = 3.506973286e-07\\ | ||
- | double | + | Double |
- | Emittance = 3.045387898578198e-07 | + | Emittance = 3.045387898578198e-07 |
- | start beam emittance= XX * AX= 0.2 π mm mrad so the emittance grows from the start to the focal point | + | start beam emittance= XX * AX= 0.2 π mm mrad so the emittance grows from the start to the focal point\\ |
+ | Emittance grows due to the optics aberrations. Input COSY file shows 4th-order-calculation. Also measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. optics is non-linear.\\ | ||