JINA-CEE ION OPTICS SUMMER SCHOOL: JIOSS 2018

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
group_secar2.0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/11 16:14]
wagner 		group_secar2.0 [2018/09/12 14:13]
gamage
Line 1: Line 1:
-Group SECAR2.0+====== Group SECAR2.0 ======
  
--by Alex, Nadeesha and Louis-+-- by Alex, Nadeesha and Louis --
  
-====== DAY1======\\+===== DAY1===== 
 +==== Getting started =====
  
-===== Getting started =====\\ 
 Choosen example reaction: <sup>45</sup>V(p,γ)<sup>46</sup>Cr\\ Choosen example reaction: <sup>45</sup>V(p,γ)<sup>46</sup>Cr\\
 ⇒important for <sup>44</sup>Ti production rate in core collapse Supernova ([[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947403008704|Horoi et al. Nucl.Phys.A 718, (2003)]])\\ ⇒important for <sup>44</sup>Ti production rate in core collapse Supernova ([[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947403008704|Horoi et al. Nucl.Phys.A 718, (2003)]])\\
 Beam: <sup>45</sup>V<sup>13+</sup> of 135 MeV (1% enegry spread)\\ Beam: <sup>45</sup>V<sup>13+</sup> of 135 MeV (1% enegry spread)\\
 {{ :dipole.png?300 |}}\\ {{ :dipole.png?300 |}}\\
-**Understanding COSY Matrix output:**\\+====Understanding COSY Matrix output==== 
 +Command: OV 1 1 0 ; {order 1, phase space dim 1 INCLUDING ENERGY, # of parameters 0}\\ 
 +Output:\\
 |1.0|0.0|0.0|0.0|-0.41| |1.0|0.0|0.0|0.0|-0.41|
 |2.2|1.0|0.0|0.0|-0.35|\\ |2.2|1.0|0.0|0.0|-0.35|\\
 +Explanation:
 +|R<sub>11</sub>|R<sub>12</sub>|0.0|0.0|R<sub>15</sub>|
 +|R<sub>21</sub>|R<sub>22</sub>|0.0|0.0|R<sub>25</sub>|\\
 R<sub>11</sub> = 1.0 is "Magnification", i.e. no magnification provided with the dipole.\\ R<sub>11</sub> = 1.0 is "Magnification", i.e. no magnification provided with the dipole.\\
 R<sub>12</sub> = 0.0 is "Focusing", i.e. no focusing is provided by the dipole.\\ R<sub>12</sub> = 0.0 is "Focusing", i.e. no focusing is provided by the dipole.\\
Line 20: Line 25:
 R<sub>25</sub> = -0.35 is ToF difference due to different initial angle.\\ R<sub>25</sub> = -0.35 is ToF difference due to different initial angle.\\
  
 +==== Reaction Kinematics Calculation====
 {{ :reaction_kinematics.png?400 |}} {{ :reaction_kinematics.png?400 |}}
-Reaction summary for <sup>45</sup>V+p→γ+<sup>46</sup>Cr, Ek(<sup>45</sup>V)=135 MeV\\+ 
 +Reaction summary for <sup>45</sup>V+p→γ+<sup>46</sup>Cr, E<sub>kin</sub>(<sup>45</sup>V)=135 MeV\\
 The maximum γ energy is 8.481 MeV. The minimum γ energy is 7.249 MeV.\\ The maximum γ energy is 8.481 MeV. The minimum γ energy is 7.249 MeV.\\
 The maximum <sup>46</sup>Cr energy is **132.634 MeV**. The minimum <sup>46</sup>Cr energy is **131.402 MeV**. The maximum <sup>46</sup>Cr angle is **0.13 degrees**.\\ The maximum <sup>46</sup>Cr energy is **132.634 MeV**. The minimum <sup>46</sup>Cr energy is **131.402 MeV**. The maximum <sup>46</sup>Cr angle is **0.13 degrees**.\\
  
-Assume normalized emittance 0.6 π mm mrad provided from ReA3 at 3.0 MeV/u. \\ +If we assume a normalized emittance of 0.6 π mm mrad provided from ReA3 at 3.0 MeV/u the geometric emittance is 0.6/0.08 = 7.5 π mm mrad.\\ 
-Geometric emittance is 0.6/0.08 = 7.5 π mm mrad.\\ +With the spot size on the target, designed to be ±0.5 mm (1σ), the anglular spread then is ±15 mrad.\\ 
-Spot size on the target is ±0.5 mm (full width). Then anglular spread is ±15 mrad.\\ +Adding the calculated spread from the reaction with the target of 0.13 deg = ±2.26 mrad we get ±17.26 mrad of angular spread.\\ 
-Adding the effect from the target of 0.13 deg = ±2.26 mrad we get ±17.26 mrad of angular spread:\\ +⇒COSY beam input: SB 0.0005 **0.01726** 0 0.0005 **0.01726** 0 0 0.0047 0 0 0 ;\\ 
-SB 0.0005 0.01726 0 0.0005 0.01726 0 0 0.0047 0 0 0 ;\\ +Output for this beam passing the dipole:
 {{ :dipole46cr13.png?400 |}} {{ :dipole46cr13.png?400 |}}
  
-**DAY2**\\ +===== DAY2 ===== 
-**Emittance measurement**\\ + 
-Distance between Q7 center and focal plane is 6.085 m.+==== Emittance Measurement ==== 
 + 
 +The distance between the center of Q7 and the focal plane FP2 is 6.085 m as extracted from the script file.
 {{ :emittance.png?400 |}} {{ :emittance.png?400 |}}
  
-**Q7 strenght variation:**\\ +=== Quadrupole strenght variations for emittance measurment ===
-|B [T] |Xmax[m] |ap [m] |Brho* [Tm] |L [m] |K| +
-|0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.065384615| +
-|0.01 |2.27E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.032692308| +
-|0 |1.62E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0| +
-|-0.01 |1.20E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.032692308| +
-|-0.02 |9.08E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.065384615| +
-|-0.03 |6.23E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.098076923| +
-|-0.04 |9.54E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.130769231| +
-|-0.05 |1.60E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.163461538| +
-|-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.196153846|\\+
  
-*Brho the magnetic rigidity was extracted from COSY by comand CONS(CHIM)\\+|B<sub>Q7</sub> [T] |X<sub>max</sub>[m] |ap [m] |Bρ* [Tm] |L [m] |K| 
 +|0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |0.065384615| 
 +|0.01 |2.27E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |0.032692308| 
 +|0 |1.62E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |0| 
 +|-0.01 |1.20E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.032692308| 
 +|-0.02 |9.08E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.065384615| 
 +|-0.03 |6.23E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.098076923| 
 +|-0.04 |9.54E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.130769231| 
 +|-0.05 |1.60E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.163461538| 
 +|-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.196153846|\\ 
 + 
 +*Bρ the magnetic rigidity was extracted from COSY by comand CONS(CHIM)\\ 
 + 
 +=== Fit of the data to parabola ===
  
-**Fit of the data to parabola** 
 {{ :plot.png?400 |}} {{ :plot.png?400 |}}
 +
 +Fit result for parabola X<sub>max</sub><sup>2</sup> = σ<sub>11</sub> = a·K<sup>2</sup> - 2ab·K + ab<sup>2</sup> + c is:\\
  
 a = 0.000362572706 \\ a = 0.000362572706 \\
 b = 0.0834414129893 \\ b = 0.0834414129893 \\
 c = 3.506973286e-07\\ c = 3.506973286e-07\\
-Double check for beam size calculation in Q7: X_calculated = 3.13mm, X_cosy_read_out = 3.16mm at the Q7 exit.\\ 
-Emittance = 3.045387898578198e-07  π m rad= 0.3 π mm mrad.\\ 
-Start beam emittance= XX * AX= 0.2 π mm mrad, so the emittance grows from the start to the focal point.\\ 
-This rmittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. Input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. optics is non-linear.\\ 
  
 +The consistency check for beam size calculation in Q7 shows:\\
 +X_calculated = 3.13mm, X_cosy_read_out = 3.16mm at the Q7 exit.\\
 +Emittance calculated from fit parameters ε= √(ac) / L<sup>2</sup> = 3.05E-7 π m rad = **0.305 π mm mrad**.\\
 +Start beam emittance= XX · AX= 0.2 π mm mrad, so the emittance grows from the start to the focal point.\\
 +This emittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. That is because the input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. the optics is non-linear.\\
 +
 +===== DAY3=====
 +==== Impact of Lenght Change in Quadrupole 2 ====
 +
 +The effective length of Q2 was reduced by 3% to 0.291m with the drift lenghts before and after increased by 0.0045m.\\
 +This led to a mass resolution change from 445 to 102 for the standard particle of the script.
  
/srv/thewikis/JIOSS/data/pages/group_secar2.0.txt · Last modified: 2018/09/13 16:49 by plastun

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki