JINA-CEE ION OPTICS SUMMER SCHOOL: JIOSS 2018

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
group_secar2.0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/11 16:52]
wagner 		group_secar2.0 [2018/09/12 14:13]
gamage
Line 48: Line 48:
 === Quadrupole strenght variations for emittance measurment === === Quadrupole strenght variations for emittance measurment ===
  
-|B<sub>Q7</sub> [T] |X<sub>max</sub>[m] |ap [m] |Bρ* [Tm] |L<sub>Q7</sub> [m] |K| +|B<sub>Q7</sub> [T] |X<sub>max</sub>[m] |ap [m] |Bρ* [Tm] |L [m] |K| 
-|0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.065384615| +|0.02 |2.91E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |0.065384615| 
-|0.01 |2.27E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0.032692308| +|0.01 |2.27E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |0.032692308| 
-|0 |1.62E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |0| +|0 |1.62E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |0| 
-|-0.01 |1.20E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.032692308| +|-0.01 |1.20E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.032692308| 
-|-0.02 |9.08E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.065384615| +|-0.02 |9.08E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.065384615| 
-|-0.03 |6.23E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.098076923| +|-0.03 |6.23E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.098076923| 
-|-0.04 |9.54E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.130769231| +|-0.04 |9.54E-04 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.130769231| 
-|-0.05 |1.60E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.163461538| +|-0.05 |1.60E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.163461538| 
-|-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |0.34 |-0.196153846|\\+|-0.06 |2.26E-03 |0.13 |0.8 |6.085 |-0.196153846|\\
  
 *Bρ the magnetic rigidity was extracted from COSY by comand CONS(CHIM)\\ *Bρ the magnetic rigidity was extracted from COSY by comand CONS(CHIM)\\
Line 73: Line 73:
 The consistency check for beam size calculation in Q7 shows:\\ The consistency check for beam size calculation in Q7 shows:\\
 X_calculated = 3.13mm, X_cosy_read_out = 3.16mm at the Q7 exit.\\ X_calculated = 3.13mm, X_cosy_read_out = 3.16mm at the Q7 exit.\\
-Emittance calculated from fit parameter  = 3.045387898578198e-07  π m rad= 0.3 π mm mrad.\\ +Emittance calculated from fit parameters ε= √(ac) / L<sup>2</sup> = 3.05E-7 π m rad = **0.305 π mm mrad**.\\ 
-Start beam emittance= XX * AX= 0.2 π mm mrad, so the emittance grows from the start to the focal point.\\ +Start beam emittance= XX · AX= 0.2 π mm mrad, so the emittance grows from the start to the focal point.\\ 
-This rmittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. Input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. the optics is non-linear.\\+This emittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. That is because the input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. the optics is non-linear.\\
  
 +===== DAY3=====
 +==== Impact of Lenght Change in Quadrupole 2 ====
 +
 +The effective length of Q2 was reduced by 3% to 0.291m with the drift lenghts before and after increased by 0.0045m.\\
 +This led to a mass resolution change from 445 to 102 for the standard particle of the script.
  
/srv/thewikis/JIOSS/data/pages/group_secar2.0.txt · Last modified: 2018/09/13 16:49 by plastun

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki