Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- group_secar2.0 [2018/09/13 14:51]
plastun
+++ group_secar2.0 [2018/09/13 15:12]
plastun
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 -- by Alex, Nadeesha and Louis --
 ===== DAY1=====
@@ Line 28: / Line 29: @@
 {{ :reaction_kinematics.png?400 |}}
-Reaction summary for <sup>45</sup>V+p→γ+<sup>46</sup>Cr, E<sub>kin</sub>(<sup>45</sup>V)=135 MeV\\
+Reaction summary for <sup>45</sup>V+p → γ+<sup>46</sup>Cr, E<sub>kin</sub>(<sup>45</sup>V)=135 MeV\\
 The maximum γ energy is 8.481 MeV. The minimum γ energy is 7.249 MeV.\\
 The maximum <sup>46</sup>Cr energy is **132.634 MeV**. The minimum <sup>46</sup>Cr energy is **131.402 MeV**. The maximum <sup>46</sup>Cr angle is **0.13 degrees**.\\
@@ Line 39: / Line 40: @@
 {{ :dipole46cr13.png?400 |}}
+----
 ===== DAY2 =====
@@ Line 77: / Line 79: @@
 This emittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. That is because the input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. the optics is non-linear.\\
+----
 ===== DAY3=====
 ==== Impact of Lenght Change of Quadrupole 2 ====
@@ Line 90: / Line 93: @@
 {{ :fitted.png?400 |}}
+----
 ===== DAY4=====
 ==== Optics misalignments ====
@@ Line 114: / Line 118: @@
 **Beam position. Transverse offset.**
 {{ :transv.png?450 |}}
-The resolution drops by 5% at the offsets (-0.8 mm, +0.5 mm).\\
+The resolution drops by 5% at the beam offsets (-0.8 mm, +0.5 mm). The offset is of the beam half-size order. \\
+==== Recoil tracking in SECAR ====
+**<sup>45</sup>V+p → γ+<sup>46</sup>Cr**
+Beam is set to 132MeV <sup>46</sup>Cr<sup>14+</sup>\\
+<code>
+RP 132.0 46*PARA(1) 14*PARA(2);\\
+{Design acceptances, depends on kinematics of a specific reaction!}\\
+XX:=0.0005;\\
+AX:=0.01726;\\
+YY:=0.0005;\\
+AY:=0.01726;\\
+DE:=0.0047;\\
+</code>
+{| Recoil beam fits the SECAR very well. |}
+{{ :46cr_recoil_in_secar.png?300 |}}
+----

JINA-CEE ION OPTICS SUMMER SCHOOL: JIOSS 2018

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools