This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/13 15:06] plastun |
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/13 15:10] plastun |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
-- by Alex, Nadeesha and Louis -- | -- by Alex, Nadeesha and Louis -- | ||
+ | |||
===== DAY1===== | ===== DAY1===== | ||
Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
+ | ---- | ||
===== DAY2 ===== | ===== DAY2 ===== | ||
Line 77: | Line 79: | ||
This emittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. That is because the input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. the optics is non-linear.\\ | This emittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. That is because the input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. the optics is non-linear.\\ | ||
+ | ---- | ||
===== DAY3===== | ===== DAY3===== | ||
==== Impact of Lenght Change of Quadrupole 2 ==== | ==== Impact of Lenght Change of Quadrupole 2 ==== | ||
Line 90: | Line 93: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
+ | ---- | ||
===== DAY4===== | ===== DAY4===== | ||
==== Optics misalignments ==== | ==== Optics misalignments ==== | ||
Line 127: | Line 131: | ||
YY: | YY: | ||
AY: | AY: | ||
- | DE: | + | DE: |
+ | |||
+ | {| Recoil beam fits the SECAR very well. |} | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- |