User Tools
group_secar2.0
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/13 15:07] plastun |
group_secar2.0 [2018/09/13 15:11] plastun |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| -- by Alex, Nadeesha and Louis -- | -- by Alex, Nadeesha and Louis -- | ||
| + | |||
| ===== DAY1===== | ===== DAY1===== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| ===== DAY2 ===== | ===== DAY2 ===== | ||
| Line 77: | Line 79: | ||
| This emittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. That is because the input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. the optics is non-linear.\\ | This emittance grow is possibly due to the optics aberrations. That is because the input COSY file does a 4th-order-calculation. Also the measured points don't fit the parabola ideally, i.e. the optics is non-linear.\\ | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| ===== DAY3===== | ===== DAY3===== | ||
| ==== Impact of Lenght Change of Quadrupole 2 ==== | ==== Impact of Lenght Change of Quadrupole 2 ==== | ||
| Line 90: | Line 93: | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| ===== DAY4===== | ===== DAY4===== | ||
| ==== Optics misalignments ==== | ==== Optics misalignments ==== | ||
| Line 121: | Line 125: | ||
| Beam is set to 132MeV < | Beam is set to 132MeV < | ||
| + | < | ||
| '' | '' | ||
| '' | '' | ||
| Line 127: | Line 132: | ||
| YY: | YY: | ||
| AY: | AY: | ||
| - | DE: | + | DE: |
| - | {{ : | + | </ |
| + | |||
| + | {| Recoil beam fits the SECAR very well. |} | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
/srv/thewikis/JIOSS/data/pages/group_secar2.0.txt · Last modified: 2018/09/13 16:49 by plastun
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
