User Tools

Site Tools


numexercises7_14

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
numexercises7_14 [2014/07/14 08:43]
bogner
numexercises7_14 [2014/07/14 10:18]
bogner
Line 9: Line 9:
   * Check numerically that the constructed HO wf's are orthonormal. To do this, you will want to use Gaussian quadrature to discretize the integrals. Gaussian quadrature is discussed a bit in {{:​ho_spherical.pdf| }}. If you don't have a routine to calculate quadrature points/​weights,​ take advantage of Google to find a canned routine to do this for you.   * Check numerically that the constructed HO wf's are orthonormal. To do this, you will want to use Gaussian quadrature to discretize the integrals. Gaussian quadrature is discussed a bit in {{:​ho_spherical.pdf| }}. If you don't have a routine to calculate quadrature points/​weights,​ take advantage of Google to find a canned routine to do this for you.
  
-  * Construct a subroutine that returns relative HO matrix elements of the Minnesota NN potential. The definition of the Minnesota potential ​is here:+  ​* Construct the matrix $\langle nl|T+V|n'​l\rangle$  
 + 
 +  ​* Construct a subroutine that returns relative HO matrix elements of the Minnesota NN potential. The definition of the Minnesota potential ​and a sketch of how to proceed will be given on the black board.  
 + 
 +Here are 
  
  
numexercises7_14.txt · Last modified: 2014/07/14 13:40 by bogner