Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
daq:dnl [2012/06/05 11:13] crawford [Progress] |
daq:dnl [2012/06/05 19:12] crawford [Progress] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Corrections to the other gain CC channels has not yet been successful. The measured INL corrections do not show agreement with the residuals as was the case for the 10MeV full scale data, which may indicate a problem with the extraction of the INL -- Heather and David will continue to look into this, and try to confirm the source of the problem. It is possible that correction to the 30MeV CC may not be possible without more INL measurements. | Corrections to the other gain CC channels has not yet been successful. The measured INL corrections do not show agreement with the residuals as was the case for the 10MeV full scale data, which may indicate a problem with the extraction of the INL -- Heather and David will continue to look into this, and try to confirm the source of the problem. It is possible that correction to the 30MeV CC may not be possible without more INL measurements. | ||
| - | **6/5/12**: Offline correction (in Heather's unpacker) has been demonstrated for all 10 MeV CC in the MSU set-up, and appears to work for all channels except for 1 that is messed up. The correction code has been sent to Mario for incorporation into the pre-processor. | + | **6/4/12**: Offline correction (in Heather's unpacker) has been demonstrated for all 10 MeV CC in the MSU set-up, and appears to work for all channels except for 1 that is messed up. The correction code has been sent to Mario for incorporation into the pre-processor. |
| + | **6/5/12**: Offline correction now works all 28 crystals, and has been confirmed in 226Ra data from 500Hz/CC to 6kHz/CC. | ||
