This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
culinary_services [2014/06/02 16:45] long |
culinary_services [2014/06/03 18:43] long |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
**GROUP MEMBERS**\\ | **GROUP MEMBERS**\\ | ||
Alex Long (parameters)\\ | Alex Long (parameters)\\ | ||
- | McKenzie Warren (code)\\ | + | MacKenzie Warren (code)\\ |
Nathan Parzuchowski (analysis)\\ | Nathan Parzuchowski (analysis)\\ | ||
- | **TOPIC** \\ | + | ==== TOPIC ==== |
Sensitivity studied of <sup>44</sup>Ti production in in core-collapse supernova environments. | Sensitivity studied of <sup>44</sup>Ti production in in core-collapse supernova environments. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **[[Scientific Background|Scientific Background]]** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Recipe** \\ | ||
+ | Starting with a set parameter space of peak temperatures [T<sub>9</sub> = 4 - 7] and densities [$\rho$ = 10<sup>5</sup> - 10<sup>7</sup> g/cm<sup>3</sup>]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We use analytic adiabatic freeze-out trajectories (Hoyle et al. 1964; Fowler & Hoyle 1964) which satisfy the differential equations: | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{equation} | ||
+ | \frac{dT}{dt} = \frac{-T}{3\tau} \hspace{1cm} \frac{d\rho}{dt} = -\frac{\rho}{\tau} | ||
+ | \end{equation} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where $\tau$ is some static free-fall timescale. | ||
+ | This **obviously** leads to: | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{equation} | ||
+ | T(t) = T_0 exp(-t/3\tau) \hspace{1cm} \rho (t) = \rho_0 exp(-t/\tau) | ||
+ | \end{equation} | ||
+ | where $T_0$ and $\rho_0$ are the peak temperature and density in the supernova. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then you run the code, and it doesn't work. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **REFERENCES** \\ | ||
+ | [[http://iopscience.iop.org/0067-0049/191/1/66|Trends in 44Ti and 56Ni from Core-Collapse Supernovae]]\\ | ||
+ | [[http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/504/1/500|Nuclear Reactions Governing the Nucleosynthesis of 44Ti]] |